我的:
Time for my word
Shall i cry big tears of shame because i am an american, american in america violating SH human rights and basic dignity, by publishing pictures of S in his BVD, no, i am not
For start, S looks not bad, take a picture of me in [news:/s/00:18.9-00:22.5] , i might be a shame, i would look more like homo Thompson, then that is embarrassing.
S, he is 68, he probably is proud of how he looks, now is it the bad thing to secretly snap a picture of a prison of war in his underwear and gives it to newspaper,sure, i suppose it is.
And i am sorry for taken a low road, but distance bother me a bit,this is a guy threw people out of building ,had their tongues cut off, had their arms cut off, and had a few hundred thousand murdered, sonews:/s/ what a snap in the scivvies really mean when they take a picture of mother of all bad guys
Come on ,i know you folks are all getting no word up, this is just gonna to make muslims more mad at us
Hello, they are mad already. They are right and killed 17 of their own over a phony story about desperating K, so wait soon, they are gonna to make S opposed the boy, for Arab humiliation too
But remember yesterdays, our C said was ok, was sanctified in fact, to kill Muslins while trying to kill americans, it had been a proof by Muslim scholars,so they are willing to kill their own suicide bombers and innocent children , in the name of killing the infertile, what differences are a picture in breath going to make?
Another thing, now the S's hair is jet black, he is 68, and evidently the US jailers gave him hair dye, so he could remain youthful looking
The only thing that bothers me about the whole eposide is the reason given by military source for releasing the pictures that it would be a buddy blow to the insurgency, they would see S is just a tired old man, that's like saying those A pictures who show them who is chargee around here.Didn't work that way then ,then won't work that way now, still i like the picture
官方:
Am I crying big tears of shame because I am an American and America violated Saddam Hussein's human rights and basic dignity by publishing pictures of Saddam in his BVDs?
No, I'm not.
For starters, Saddam looks good. Take a picture of me in my briefs and I would be ashamed. I'd look like Homer Simpson and that is embarrassing. Saddam is 68 years old and he ought to be proud of how he looks.
Now, is it a bad thing to secretly snap a picture of a prisoner of war in his underwear and then give it to the newspapers? Sure, I suppose it is. And, I'm sorry for taking the low road, but this didn't bother me a bit.
This is a guy who had people thrown off buildings, had their tongues cut out, had their arms cut off and had a few hundred thousand murdered. So what's a snap in the skivvies really mean when it's a picture of the mother of all bad guys?
Come on, I know you folks are getting all worked up saying, "This is just going to make Muslims mad at us."
Hello? They're mad already. They rioted and killed 17 of their own over a phony story about desecrating the Koran. So we'd assume they're going to make Saddam a poster boy for Arab humiliation, too.
But remember, on Thursday Zarqawi said it was OK — it was sanctified — to kill Muslims while trying to kill Americans. It had been approved by Muslim scholars.
So if they're already willing to kill their suicide bomber and innocent children in the name of killing the infidel, what difference is a picture in briefs going to make?
Another thing: Did you notice that Saddam's hair is jet black? He is 68 and evidently the U.S. jailers give him hair dye so he can remain youthful looking.
The only thing that bothers me about this whole episode is the reason that was reportedly given by a military source for releasing the pictures — that it would be a body blow to the insurgency, that they would see he's just a tired old man. That's like saying, "Those Abu Ghraib pictures will show them who's in charge around here."
It didn't work that way then and it won't work that way now.
Still, I liked the picture.
That's My Word.