听写稿
the vote was 229 to 191 that surprising bloke house democrate leaders who push hard for another extandhing of the protect america act which is self revision of 1978 local ******.in passing it versing on TV vilonce **** on TUESDAY the u.s. senator. ******* included the preving president bush on public has been sick.it provide munity from past coution to tel comuncations company that give the u.s goverment information without caled viont after 9.11 2001 terroist attacks.congress democrators for aganists that citing pending lall suits aganist company and thirty that normal legal prosis should be aloud **** course .after serious **** deling **** republic wedensday the half finally got down to **** the democrats bills to excend existing lall past **** brtion data.which had been the second extention the prove for it. commite chairman **** law maker should not be standpid into proving **** legslation now say more time documents among another face
参考稿
The vote was 229 to 191, a surprising blow to House Democratic leaders who pushed hard for another extension of the Protect America Act, which is itself a revision of a 1978 law called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance ACT (FISA).
In passing its version of intelligence surveillance legislation on Tuesday the U.S. Senate, voting 68 to 29, included a provision President Bush and Republicans have been seeking. It would provide immunity from prosecution to telecommunications companies that gave the U.S. government information without a court warrant after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Congressional Democrats fought against that, citing pending lawsuits against the companies, and asserting that the normal legal process should be allowed to run its course.
After a series of procedural delaying tactics by Republicans Wednesday, the House finally got down to debating the Democrat's bill to extend the existing law past its February 16 expiration date, which would have been the second extension approved for it.
House Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers said lawmakers should not be "stampeded" into approving permanent legislation now, saying more time is required to examine documents among other things.
posted on 2008-02-16 10:34
eaglecyj 阅读(30)
评论(0) 编辑 收藏 所属分类:
沪江作业-VOA
网摘收藏