2006-08-08 22:17

剛才聽LOMO的,做了個 political campass的測試. 嘿嘿


結果:俺屬於一個 自由社會主義者 嘿嘿. 沒想到啊...:) 其實從社會方面來講, 我是一定支持自由無政府的. 但是從經濟來講, 我沒有太強的傾向. 所以對新自由主義和自由社會主義, 我都沒有太強烈的反對. :)

結果:

Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08
Authoritarian


不過我現在有一個觀點已經變得很明確,(針對當代社會發展) 就是一定要有完備的法律(僅僅限於目前當代的社會).

而且對於好多問題我好像並不關心是對是錯.(所以好多選項比較難選). 我一般都是覺得一件事存在了就是存在了. 一般情況下沒有什麽對錯. 而我更關心的好像是這一存在象後面所牽連的種種關係. 而這好像也正是一件事物存在的最根本的一些問題. 我想如果我能大概明白這些關係,或者至少明白這背後哪些因素起著決定性因素, 哪些因素起著推動作用之類的...那我就根本不會對它的對錯産生興趣了.

對於經濟, 我並沒有一個特別明確的傾向. 如果說共產主義 或者說是社會主義是一種理想主義的話, 我總覺得那完全自由的競爭也是一種理想.



下面是一些關於political campass的介紹:

Political positions have traditionally been distinguished from one another on a left-right scale. The trouble is that left and right in this context are vague, qualitative descriptions. Often the same label is applied to politicians with drastically different policies; certainly Barry Goldwater's libertarianism can't be equated with Francisco Franco's totalitarianism or the theocratic rhetoric of the Iranian Ayatollahs and the U.S.'s Religious Right, though all are "right-wing" in the public eye.

The Political Compass attempts to remedy this by assigning two numerical values to each person's politics, each spanning a continuous range from -10 to +10:

Economic left-right. A score of -10 corresponds to an entirely regulated economy; the Marxist ideal. At the opposite end of the scale, a score of +10 corresponds to pure, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism.

Social authoritarian-libertarian. A -10 score on this scale is anarchy, with personal freedoms decreasing continuously until absolute fascism is reached at +10.

So we have two variables, which can be plotted in a plane. As you would suspect, the economic left-right scale forms the horizontal axis, while the social-freedom scale becomes the vertical axis. The four quadrants are then

Authoritarian Right
Authoritarian Left
Libertarian Left
Libertarian Right


                           Authoritarian
                                      | 
                                      |
                      II             |      I 
                                      | 
                                      |
Left______________|______________Right
                                      |
                                      | 
                                      |
                III                   |                  IV
                                      |
                                      |
                             Libertarian




Authoritarian right-wing politics were seen in the German Nazi regime and (with lesser severity, fortunately)in the 1980's administrations of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan in the UK and the US, respectively.

Left-wing authoritarianism is basically Communism as it is practiced; it's occurred in the Soviet Union and in China under Mao Zedong and his successors.

Left-libertarian politics were advanced in India by Mahatma Gandhi; taking leftist libertarian goals to their theoretical limit we have anarcho-syndicalism, which seems to be inordinately difficult to put into practice.

Right-libertarianism seems to be the least popular in practice; the Compass didn't give any actual political figures as examples here, though Goldwater would certainly qualify. In this quadrant we have, at the extreme, the ideals of Ayn Rand, and more moderately, the platforms of the American Libertarian Party.