期待与你们的互动,大家加油!
posted on 2007-07-11 12:19 新东方小新 阅读(2275) 评论(45)  编辑  收藏 所属分类: 雅友大联盟 网摘收藏

  回复  引用    
2007-07-16 20:56 | Jinn
Ten taboos 是哪些?
  回复  引用    
2007-07-17 13:31 | lemon
my essay, i am sorry to occupy your time to take a look at it!

1. To what extent is the use of animals in scientific research acceptable? Should we use animals in scientific experiments?

It is argued if we should use using animals in scientific experiments is immoral and cruel. So far as my understanding, the use of animal in scientific research is acceptable as long as the purpose is for medical research, animal protection, and controlled in the lab.

Using animals in medical research is acceptable. Most people understand that we cannot use humans in experiments because it may be harmful and dangerous for humans. The most useful data we gained from the experiments proved that only animals who have a similar organs as humans, can fulfill the requirements of scientific experiments in a real world. For example, some medical universities use dogs as a substitute to allow students to be trained in their surgical techniques, and use rats or dogs for medicine test. Therefore, we can not deny that animals contribute a lot to the development of science.

On the other side, it's acceptable when the experiments are used for animal protection. Scientists need study the animals before they become in danger or disappear. Animal substitutes are acceptable in the research into the reaction of the animals to the environment, For example, research into the environmental effects on the animal data of the reaction and tolerance of the animals suffering from the environment can be gain in the use of animals in the lab.

We have to make sure that the animal experiment is carefully controlled inside the lab. We should be fully aware of the danger of the release of the substitutes and medicine. If not, contamination is irreversible. Medicine carried by the escaped fish from the lab, may cause mass death in the wild fishes. So we have to take fully responsibilities to control all the things inside the lab, and protect the natural outside.


  回复  引用    
2007-07-17 13:33 | lemon
To what extent should university courses be geared to the economic needs of society?

Nowadays, the need of working individual with more powerful economic knowledge is urgent in nowadays society. In my opinion, more university courses should be geared to the economic needs of society, for example, some economic courses could be assigned as compulsory courses to all the students. Thus, this will give the students a more future-oriented insight to devote themselves to the development of the society.

the economic development of the society demand more individual with strong economic knowledge background. It is an accepted fact that education is considered as the most powerful instrument to eradicate poverty and gear up socio-economic development for the welfare of a society. By giving the economic knowledge to every student, the power of education can give full gear to the eradiation of poverty.

Current university courses can not meet the need of society. For example, an artist do not know how to make more benefits from his painting. the economic knowledge brings skills in practical and powerful use in the society. It changes in the attitudes and behavior of the people towards a more future-oriented lifestyle thus raising the productivity and efficiency of the working individuals. These men in turn will lead the country towards the path of sustainable and efficient economic development.

What’s more, more courses with more aspects about economics should be arranged for the student. As a compulsory course offering attractive items, economic knowledge brings a more active attitude of financial management in the student. Thus, as more and more people making more rational individual management, stability can be brought to the financial market.

In conclusion, more university courses should be geared to the economic needs of society, we have to accept the fact that eco education is to bring changes in the attitudes and behavior of the people towards a more future-oriented eyesight thus raising the wisdom and efficiency of working individuals. This in turn produces powerful man that is capable of leading the country towards the path of sustainable and efficient economic development.


  回复  引用    
2007-08-02 22:07 | 秋天
呵呵,这个班的来报到啦 ~~~貌似是第一个哦
  回复  引用    
2007-08-02 22:18 | 咩咩
呵呵...第二个...可惜今天有事...只上了下午的课...不晓得是不是错过了一些精彩的内容...唉...明天去要补笔记了...
  回复  引用    
2007-08-02 22:23 | No(_棉花糖ゞ
大家做下交流吧,都是快要西天取经的.在那可能会相当寂寞
  回复  引用    
2007-08-02 23:01 | June(*o*
报道来了有空要联系啊!E-MAIL:Selina621@yahoo.com~~
PS:大家都要“飞”啊
  回复  引用    
2007-08-02 23:33 | momo
来报到的可真啊!
我发现老师贴的几首音乐不错!

  回复  引用    
2007-08-02 23:53 | Elvera
原来有那么多人来报道啦。。。昨天来看过了 早知道昨天报道好了。。。
昨天还在希望小新上课 今天果然是~~~~开心
  回复  引用    
2007-08-03 01:23 | 沙沙
今天上了小新的课,收益颇多啊,不过脑细胞也伤了不少,以后要多吃蛋白质补补了。
谢谢老师的课,很棒啊~
  回复  引用    
2007-08-03 04:29 | Lay
那个。。。。。那个。。。。。。。。。
上面两段~~~~~~
是。。。。。。。什么意思呀?
  回复  引用    
2007-08-03 11:41 | cute guy
如果是9.8号考,是不是有流程图啊

  回复  引用    
2007-08-03 13:02 | jenny
这是你布置的作业,请批阅!(红皮书p78)

These two pie charts showed the major source of energy in the US from 1970 to 1980.Among the five major sources of energy are nuclear, coal, natural gas, hydro and oil. In 1970, Coal covered comparatively a major of the total electric energy production, with 47%.But Nuclear occupied comparatively a minority of the total energy, with 1%.Then, a small portion of the electric energy production by the Oil and Hydro. The remaining 24 percent was due to the Natural Gas.
On the other hand, the year of 1980 witnessed boom of 4% in Coal. There was an increase of 10% in Nuclear. We can witnessed a decrease of 4% in Hydro. Nature Gas subsided sharply. There was an ebb of 9% in it. Oil almost remained stable at nearly 11%.

  回复  引用    
2007-08-04 22:20 | 新东方小新
These two pie charts showed the major source of energy in the US from 1970 to 1980.Among the five major sources of energy are nuclear, coal, natural gas, hydro and oil respectively. In 1970, Coal covered comparatively a major of the total electric energy production, with 47%.However, Nuclear occupied comparatively a minority of the total energy, with 1%.Then, a small portion of the electric energy production by the Oil and Hydro. The remaining 24 percent was due to the Natural Gas.
On the other hand, the year of 1980 witnessed a boom of 4% in Coal. There was an increase of 10% in Nuclear. We can witnessed a decrease of 4% in Hydro. Nature Gas subsided sharply. There was an ebb of 9% in it. Oil almost remained stable at nearly 11%.

Band 6



  回复  引用    
2007-08-05 01:45 | Caroline
来报到咯!
E-Mail: Caroline.qsj@gmail.com
附上我的作业,希望老师抽空能帮我批阅下,并指出不足之处,不胜感激,谢谢!
红P78
Coal covered comparatively a majority of the electric energy productions, with 47 percent, while Nuclear occupied a tiny portion of the productions with 1%. A quarter of the electric energy productions were shared by Oil and Hydro. The rest 24 percent is due to Natural Gas.
The Coal in 1980 outnumbered its counterpart by 4%. Nuclear increased by 10 times. The year of 1980 witnessed that the percentage of Hydro crept down to 12%, and there was a decrease of 9% in Natural Gas. Oil almost remained stable at nearly 11%.

红P72
All statistics can be categorized into 3 stages, with the equilibrium of birth and death rates in a developing country in the first decades, with predominance of birth rate in the following two decades and predominance of death rates during rest 40 years.
Birth rate fluctuated within a small range from 1900 to 1910. Then it soared, reaching a peak at 60 in 1920 and it slumped, bottoming out at 20 in 1940. It ebbed with 20 in 1940, and then it rose and fell evenly. Finally it crept down to the end. On the other hand, the death rate fell gradually and gently, then it surged, reaching a peak with 50 in 1940. At last it abated.

  回复  引用    
2007-08-05 15:39 | jenny
谢谢小新的批阅!
你是不是对美术也很感兴趣?从你衣着色彩搭配上看的出。
  回复  引用    
2007-08-05 21:10 | Peggy
小新那么忙还要帮我们批作业啊,抽空也帮我批下吧,谢啦:)
红P78
The percentage of Coal in 1970 occupied comparatively a majority of the electric energy production in the US. While the Nuclear took up a tiny portion of the total production, with only 1%. Also, 12% and 16% of the electric energy production were shared respectively by the Hydro. What’s more, the remaining 24% was due to natural Gas in 1970.
On the other hand, the percentage of Coal crept up to 51% in 1980. And there was a dramatic raise by 10 times in Nuclear, which grew to 11%. However, the year of 1980 also witnessed a steady decrease both in the Hydro and the Natural Gas, which was in the percentage of 4% and 9% respectively. As what we may imagine, the Oil almost remained stable at nearly 11% in 1980.


  回复  引用    
2007-08-06 12:06 | jenny
小新看看吧!:) THX
P72 (红皮)
The line chart described birth and death rates in a developing country from 1900 to 1970.
All statistics can be categorized into 3 stages, with the equilibrium of death rate and birth rate from 1900 to 1910, with the predominance of birth rate from 1910 to 1930 and predominance of death rate during the rest 40 years. The birth rate even out initially. Then it soared sharply .It fluctuated ,reaching a peak at 60 per thousand in 1920 and bottoming out at 25 per thousand in 1940.From 1940 to 1960, it rose and fell evenly .Finally, there was crept down slightly to 1970.
On the other hand, the death rate even out correspondingly in 1910 and abated gently. Then it surged dramatically during 1930 and 1940.
At last, we can witnessed a steady ebb to 1970. (136)



P2 (破纸)
These two pie charts show the differences between 25 to 34 and 55 to 69 years old of their post-school qualifications in Australia.
The group of 25 to 34 years old, Administration, Social Sciences ,Science Maths Computers and Education covers comparatively a majority of the total degrees, with 19.08%,19.48%,18.19% and 14.76%. However, Others, Veterinary, Architecture accounts for a minority of the total degrees, with 2.24%,2.10% and 1.84% relatively. The remaining percentage are in moderation, with 5.53%,7.4% and 9.35% respectively.
On the other hand, the group of 55 to 69 years old, there is a sharply increase of 10% in Engineering. It has been soared three times as against the initial Engineering. We can witness a gently boom of 3.95 in Medicine. Nevertheless Science, Maths, Computers are decrease dramatically in the percentage of 8.08%.The percentage of Administration ebbs to 14.98%.Finally, the remaining percentages are stable comparatively. (145)

  回复  引用    
2007-08-09 13:49 | nancy1
YP119 《雅思写作》P78 作业 (Pie Chart)
In 1970, the percentage of Coal covered comparatively a majority of the total sources of energy with 47 percent while the percentage of Nuclear accounted for a tiny portion of the total sources of energy with 1 percent in the US. On the other hand, 12 percent and 16 percent of the total sources of energy were shared by oil and hydro respectively. The remaining 24 percent was due to Natural Gas.
In 1980, the percentage of Coal crept up by 4 percent from 47 percent in 1970 to 51 percent in 1980. Also, we can witness a dramatic increase in the percentage of Nuclear by 11 times from 1 percent in 1970 to 11 percent in 1980. However, there was a decrease of 4 percent in Hydro from 16 percent in 1970 to 12 percent in 1980. Likewise, the percentage of Natural Gas decreased by 9 percent from 24 percent in 1970 to 15 percent in 1980. Of the total sources, oil almost remained level, from 12 percent in 1970 to 11 percent 1980.
《雅思写作》P72作业 (Line Chart)
All trends can be categorized into three stages with the equilibrium between death rate and birth rate in the first decade, the predominance of birth rate in the following two decades and the predominance of death rate during the rest of 40 years.
From the chart of birth rate, we can witness that it remained nearly level at 40 from 1990 to 1910.In 1910, it soared and reached a peak at 60 in 1920. However, it slumped and reached a bottom at 20 in the following two decades and then it rose and fell evenly from 1940 to 1960 and began to creep down again.
On the other hand, the death rate remained almost stable from 1900 to 1910 and it began to creep down from 40 to 30 in the following two decades. From 1930 to 1940, however, it soared and reached a peak at 50 and then it subsided gently during the rest of 30 years.
《雅思精品作文讲义》P24作业 (Pie Chart)
As for Australian aged between 25 and 34 hold a degree, the percentage of Administration, Social Sciences, Art, Education and Science, Maths, Computers covered comparatively a majority of the total fields with 19.08 percent, 19.48 percent,14.76 percent and 18.19 percent respectively.
On the other hand, the percentage of Architecture, Veterinary Agriculture and other took up a tiny portion of the total fields with 1.84 percent, 2.10 percent and 2.24 percent respectively.
The remaining percentage was in a moderation of the total fields with 5.53 percent in Law, 7.4 percent in Medicine and 9.35 percent in Engineering respectively.

As for people aged 55 to 69 hold a degree, there was a significant increase of 9.92 percent in Engineering from 9.35 percent to 19.27 percent. Similarly, the percentage increased by 3.95 percent in Medicine from7.4 percent to11.35 percent, by 1.12 percent in Architecture from 1.84 percent to 2.96 percent, and by 0.24 percent in Other from 2.24 percent to 2.48 percent.
On the contrary, we can witness a sharp decrease by 8.08 percent in Science, Maths, Computers from 18.19 percent to 10.11 percent followed by a decrease by 4.1 percent in Administration from 19.08 percent to 14.98 percent, a decrease by 2.19 percent in Law from 5.53 percent to 3.34 percent and a slight decline by 1.59 percent in Education from 14.76 percent to 13.17 percent.
Among all fields, Veterinary Agriculture and Social Sciences, Art almost remained stable. The percentage of Veterinary Agriculture crept down by 0.1 percent from 2.10 percent to 2.0 percent while Social Sciences, Art outnumbered its counterpart only by 0.94 percent from 19.48 percent to 20.42 percent.

  回复  引用    
2007-08-10 11:03 | wahaa
精品作文讲义P31
As is shown in the table,the percentage of people employed in different types of industy in Britian and China varied from 1970 to 2000.
All the trends can be categorized into 3 groups with fluctuating items such as Finance and Computer Industy in Britain,rising items including Argiculture in Britain,computer Industy and Finance in China,falling items containing Manaul Labour in Britain and Agriculture in China.The general trend of people employed in Computer Industry in China and Manaul Labour in Britain rose and fell comparatively sharply,reaching a peak at 2000 and bottoming out at 1990.People employed in Finance in Britain and Agriculture if China boomed with a range of approximately 10 and 30.People employed in Manual Labour of China and Agriculture,Manual Labour of Britain,averaging out at nearly 30,20,and 40.
What is worth mentioning is that since the overall percentages add up to above and below 100%,it indicates the fact that some people engaged in several industry and other industry
  回复  引用    
2007-08-11 20:52 | nancy1
TT 《雅思精品作文讲义》 P31
All trends can be categorized into three groups with rising in items such as Agriculture in Britain, Computer Industry in China and Finance in China, falling in items like Agriculture in China and fluctuating in items including Computer Industry in Britain, Finance in Britain, Manual Labour in Britain and Manual Labour in China.

The general trend of Computer Industry in China rose dramatically, reaching a peak at 40 in 2000, bottoming out at 5 in 1970. The trend of Manual Labour in Britain fluctuated significantly, reaching an apex at 61 in 1970 and hitting a trough at 20 in 1990. This was the contrary with the trend of Computer Industry in Britain. However, Agriculture in Britain boomed, averaging out at nearly 20. This was the same case with the trend of Manual Labour in China, which was the opposite with that of Finance in China. Finance in Britain fluctuated within a range of 10 while Agriculture in China subsided within a range of approximately 30.

What is worth mentioning is that some people were engaged in several jobs in 1970 while some people were engaged in other industries in 2000.


TT 《雅思精品作文讲义》 P29
All trends can be divided into four groups with falling in items such as Food, Alcoholic drink, Tobacco, Fuel, light and power and Other goods and services, rising in items including Housing, transport and communications and Recreation, entertainment and education, fluctuating in Household goods and services and stabilizing in Other items.

Household goods and services fluctuated dramatically, reaching a peak at 14 in 1996, bottoming out at 7 in 1977. Transport and communications rose sharply from 9 in 1967 to 16 in 1996. On the other hand, Other goods and services subsided within a range of 6. This was almost the same case with Alcoholic drink and Fuel, light and power. However, Food crept down, averaging out at nearly 20. Similarly, Housing accrued with an average of 14. This was the same case with Recreation, entertainment and education, which was just opposite with that of Tobacco.

What is worth mentioning is that Other items did not make its debut until 1977, stabilizing at 1 from 1977 to 1996.


ST 《雅思写作》 P76
From the table above, we can witness the disparity between the perceptions of CEOs and that of their spouses and partners in terms of factors perceived to produce stress.

The three major factors in CEOs’ opinions were: Time pressures and deadlines with 52 percent, Demands of work on private life with 48 percent and demands of work on the relationship with family with 45 percent. On the other hand, “Work overload and Long working hours” were the two sources ranked first with 62 percent respectively as the major factors for their spouses and partners to concern. Both groups realized the predominance of “Time pressures and deadlines” among all factors. CEOs cared more about the general issues such as “demands of work” but their spouses and partners paid more attentions to some specific items including “Work overload, Long working hours and Work-related travel”. The evident difference in the percentage of factors is “Long working hours”. CEO regarded it as a source with 24 percent while their spouses and partners saw it as a factor with 62 percent.
作业已完成,请老师批阅并评分,谢谢!
  回复  引用    
2007-08-13 14:03 | Peggy
红P76
Static table
As is showed in the table, the ways CEOs and their partners or spouses perceive pressures differed dramatically. All statistics an be categorized into 3 groups with predominance of pressure in CEO in items such as Demands of work on private life, predominance of that in their spouses including work overload and equilibrium of that between CEO and their partner, especially in the item of Taking work home.

The main source of stress as far as CEOs were concerned, was Time pressure and deadlines, with 52%, which turned out to be the second large pressure for their partner, with 60%.We can witness that the lightest pressure sources for CEOs was Long working hours, Taking work time and Inadequately trained subordinates, each with 24%. While its counterpart for their spouses were still the Inadequately trained subordinates, with 17%. Therefore, both of the CEOs and their spouses paid considerably attention to Time pressure and deadlines respectively. On the contrary, neither CEOs nor their partners were very aware of the stress brought by Inadequately trained subordinates. What’s more, the biggest difference was in the numbers dominated by long working hours which was only 24% to CEOs but rocketed to 62% for their partners.
总觉得ST比较没底阿,不知道能用上哪些小新的句型,帮忙看一下吧!
  回复  引用    
2007-08-14 00:30 | yan
雅思精品作文讲义 , P29
老师,请问所有的图表作文都可以挖掘HC吗?图表作文写两段就够,还是三段比较好?


all trends can be categorized into four groups, with falling in items such as food, rising in
items including housing, fluctuating in household goods and services and stabilizing in other
items.

the expenditure of tobacco reached a plateau at seven percent in 1967 and 1977, while in 1996
it fell dramatically to four percent. this is almost the trends of fuel, light and power.
british families' consuming on housing accrued in these three years, so did recreation,
entertainment and education, which was the opposite with the trend of tobacco. average family
expenditure in britain on household and goods and services wavered within a range of
approximately seven percent. the expense of other items didn't make it's debut until 1977 and
remained stable at one percent.

in conclusion, people pay more attention on mental needs and living condition. on the contrary, the expenditure on basic life needs decrease gently.

  回复  引用    
2007-08-14 12:43 | jenny
不好意思,老师赶紧批个一、二篇吧,好给我点写下去的勇气,好吗?
讲义p31(table)
All trends can be categorized into 3 groups with rising in Agriculture of Britain, Computer Industry and Finance in China, fluctuating in Computer Industry, Finance and Manual Labour of Britain, Manual Labour in China, falling in Agriculture of China.
The general trend of the Computer Industry in China rose sharply, reaching an apex at 40 in 2000 and hitting a trough at 5 in 1970. However, the general trend of the Manual Labour in Britain slumped dramatically, reaching a vertex at 61 in 1970 and nadiring at 40 in 2000. We can witnessed Finance in Britain boomed within a small range of approximately 8. Agriculture in China plummeted within a large range of circa 31. Manual Labour in China retrieved, averaging out at nearly 30. The trend of Agriculture in Britain rose and fell evenly, averaging out at nearly 20. Manual Labour in Britain was the opposite with the trend of Manual Labour in China.
From the perspective of employment, we can witnessed booming industry was Agriculture in Britain and Computer Industry, Finance in China. Furthermore, deteriorating industry was Agriculture in China. Besides, wavering industry was Computer Industry, Finance, Manual Labour in Britain and Manual Labour in China.

  回复  引用    
2007-08-15 12:10 | jenny
讲义p29 (table)
All trends can be categorized into 4 groups with falling in items such as Food, rising in items including Housing, fluctuating in Household goods and services, and stabilizing in Other items.
Transport and communications soared sharply ,reaching an acme at 16 in 1996 and hitting a trough at 9 in 1967. However ,Household goods and services was variable considerably , reach a peak at 14 in 1996 and bottoming out at 7 in 1977. Other goods and services subsided within a range of circa 6. Furthermore, there was an ebb in Food, taking an average at nearly 19. Housing accrued from 1967 to 1996 with a balance of 14. Similarly, this was true of Recreation, entertainment and education with an average of 9 in 1977, which was the opposite with that of Tobacco.
What is worth mentioning is that Other items, not making its debut until 1977, remained stable at 1%.

  回复  引用    
2007-08-19 21:33 | cool guy
day 1;
red book 80 pie chart

As is shown in the pie chart,the amount of the daily water intake and output differed respectively.


The daily water intake included two parts,Solid Food and Fluids.The solid Food was less than Fluids with 500(c.c).The sum of the daily water intake was 2500(c.c).The Solid Food and Fluids were 1000(c.c) and 1500(c.c) respectively.

The daily water output was categorized into 4 groups such as Lungs,Sweat,Soild wastes and Liquid water kidneys.The total of the number was 2500(c.c) which was same with the daily water intake.The Liquid water kdineys covered a comparatively majority of all the outputting.The Solid wastes tooke up a minority of all the daily water output.The remaining 900(c.c) were due to the Lungs and Sweat with 400(c.c) and 500(c.c) respectively.
  回复  引用    
2007-08-20 14:02 | Caroline
小新老师,你说的9号球笔记上有两个段落的,没有找到耶,请提点下吧,谢谢!
  回复  引用    
2007-08-20 21:25 | cool guy
day2 line chart red book 68

All trends could be categorized into two stages with fluctuating from 1956 to 1975 in defence spending and its percent of GNP in USA.

The first graph indicated the growth of defence spending.It surged from 1956 to 1971 with approxiamtely 45 billions of dollors.Then,we can witness a sharply decrease a sharply decrease and a dramatical increase from 1972 to 1975 with the changing of roughly 5 billions of dollars.

The second graph showed the defence spending's percent of GNP. There's a considerly slump from 1956 to 1963 and 1967 to 1975 with about 2.2% and 3.2%.IT swelled rapidly from 1963 to 1967 with nearly 1.3%.
  回复  引用    
2007-08-21 17:47 | Peggy
It has been widely heeded that, with the popularity of students getting a job or travel for skills before going to university, there crops up a social dilemma over the hot potato of whether it is legitimate that graduates get less benefit and make less contribution. To be candid, I am in high favor of the feasibility of those who have a cornerstone of knowledge.

The 21st century is known as a knowledge-burning period so that one who is short of cognition will soon lose his core competence,. The rapid renovation calls for talents to keep up with the Joneses. Meeting the competition with their peers, those who get a job before attending university will probably discover their disadvantage, especially of the operation on new information technology and application of hot business theory. Furthermore, they will lack of career developments because their employers often have doubt on their qualifications without a degree, let alone higher salary.

I always hold the opinion that people who enter the society after university study are more likely to obey the laws. Not only did they learn the special courses from campus, but also they were well prepared in quality. In this way, they c